Collaborative leadership for future ready learning requires leaders at all levels apply equity-focused innovative approaches. Future ready leaders are empowered to think and act with innovation in mind, with the willingness to embrace curricular and instructional enhancements as learning needs evolve and culture demands. They must believe in the district’s shared, forward-thinking vision for learner-centered instruction through effective and intentional uses of innovative learning practices, tools, technologies, and resources, while ensuring equity in access and opportunity for all students. Critical to success is active demonstration of a culture of innovation whereby trust fuels the capacity of students, teachers, administrators, caregivers, and community to work in collaborative support of that vision. The resulting foundational policies reflect the coherency, consistency, and accountability required to prepare learners to thrive in today’s issue-driven, globally, and digitally connected workforce and society.
A Shared, Forward-Thinking Vision for Teaching and Learning
Recognizing that today’s students communicate, create, and seek education through connected devices and technology-based programs, schools must be proactive, adaptive, and inclusive of technology where appropriate. A learning environment that engages students in evidence-based practices and pedagogies, alongside intentional use of interactive tools, is essential to prepare students to thrive in today’s fast-paced society. Additionally, districts must engage students, teachers, administrators, caregivers, stakeholders, and the community as trusted partners in the process of learning. From identifying goals and envisioning outcomes to implementing a district’s future ready initiative, collaborative leaders personalize learning for all through the effective uses of technology, communicating how effective teaching and learning practices look and feel as learners acquire, practice, and master these essential skills.
A Culture of Collaboration, Innovation, Capacity Building, and Empowerment
Future ready leadership nurtures and cultivates a collaborative culture in which leaders at all levels along with stakeholders are empowered to innovate. Capacity is maximized when trust, transparency, risk-taking, and respect are consistently modeled. Future ready leaders hold themselves to high expectations, demonstrating the flexibility, agility, and adaptability necessary to support, inspire, and assure an inclusive and dynamic team. Future ready leaders recruit and garner stakeholder support, creating reciprocal and dynamic partnerships steeped in trust and value. Core to sustainability, an innovative and empowered culture is informed by research, measured by student outcome data, and facilitated by competent, compassionate, future ready leaders.
High Expectations for Evidence-Based Transformations to Teaching and Learning
Regardless of role, teachers, administrators, and students are challenged to show progress toward the district vision. The district establishes metrics to gauge such progress, actively monitors efforts, and incorporates positive, yet critical, feedback throughout the process. Frequent cultivation and evaluation of multisourced evidence ensures that instructional resources and technologies are implemented in ways that advance the vision. Consistent and transparent communication with stakeholders demonstrates and solidifies trust and supports the adoption of innovative approaches.
Transformative, Coherent Thinking Via the Future Ready Process
A forward-thinking, future ready vision is advanced through leaders’ transformative thinking and collaborative endeavors. Future ready leaders ensure that district policies are coherent and parallel the underpinning philosophy of the vision (e.g., personalizing professional learning for educators, just as they personalize learning for students). They work collaboratively to develop strategic plans with input from a variety of stakeholders, map potential pathways to the future, and create tactical and financial plans with an appropriate budget for implementation. As active participants and leaders of implementation, they monitor, adjust, build capacity, and iterate for continuous improvement.
This podcast highlights school and district leaders, who reflect on lessons learned during the global pandemic and the challenges that they face with reopening for the new school year.
- A. Bain and M. E. Weston, The Learning Edge: What Technology Can Do to Educate All Children (New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2012).
- M. Barber, K. Donnelly, and S. Rizvi (2012). Oceans of Innovation: The Atlantic, the Pacific, Global Leadership and the Future of Education. (London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 2012), https://www.ippr.org/publications/oceans-of-innovation-the-atlantic-the-pacific-global-leadership-and-the-future-of-education.
- Council of Chief State School Officers (2020). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from https://ccsso.org/resource-library/professional-standards-educational-leaders
- M. A. Edwards, Thank You for Your Leadership: The Power of Distributed Leadership in a Digital Conversion Model (New York, NY: Pearson, 2015).
- J. B. Ellsworth, Surviving Change: A Survey of Educational Change Models (Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, 2000), http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443417.pdf.
- D. P. Ely, “Conditions That Facilitate the Implementation of Educational Technology Innovations,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23, no. 2 (1990): 298–305.
- M. Fullan, “Turnaround Leadership,” The Educational Forum 69, no. 2. (2005).
- E. A. Hanushek and L. Woessmann, Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation (NBER Working Papers 14633) (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 2009).
- A. Hargreaves, Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity (New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2003).
- F. Hess, The Future of Educational Entrepreneurship: Possibilities for School Reform (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2008).
- F. M. Hess, B. V. Valdemar, and H. Saxberg, Breakthrough Leadership in the Digital Age: Using Learning Science to Reboot Schooling (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2013).
- M. I. Honig, “Building Policy from Practice: District Central Office Administrators’ Roles and Capacity for Implementing Collaborative Education Policy,” Educational Administration Quarterly 39, no. 3 (2003): 292–338.
- J. P. Kotter, “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail,” Harvard Business Review 73, no. 2 (1995): 59–67.
- L. Lambert, “A Framework for Shared Leadership,” Educational Leadership, 59, no. 8, (2002): 37–40.
- Learning Forward, “The Standards Assessment Inventory,” http://learningforward.org/consulting/sai#.VfLU486JsmY (accessed June 16, 2020).
- K. Leithwood et al., Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning (Ontario, Canada: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 2004 https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf.
- B. B. Levin and. L. Schrum, “Technology-Rich Schools Up Close,” Educational Leadership 70, no. 6, (2013): 51–55.
- R. Marzano and T. Waters, District Leadership That Works: Striking the Right Balance (Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, 2009).
- J. P. Spillane, B. J. Reiser, and T. Reimer, “Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research,” Review of Educational Research 72, no. 3, (2002): 387–431
- T. Wagner and T. Dintersmith, Most Likely to Succeed: Preparing Our Kids for the Innovation Era (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Digital Sales Inc., 2015).
- T. Vander Ark, “How Digital Learning Is Boosting Achievement,” Getting Smart, March 1, 2014, http://gettingsmart.com/2014/03/how-digital-learning-is-boosting-achievement.